Central Sarcopenia, Frailty and Comorbidity as Predictor of Surgical Outcome in Elderly Patients with Degenerative Spine Disease

Article information

J Korean Neurosurg Soc. 2021;64(6):995-1003

Publication date (electronic) : 2021 October 7

doi : https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2021.0074

Dong Uk Kim, Hyung Ki Park, Gyeoung Hae Lee, Jae Chil Chang, Hye Ran Park, Sukh Que Park, Sung Jin Cho

Department of Neurosurgery, Soonchunhyang University Seoul Hospital, Soonchunhyang University College of Medicine, Seoul, Korea

Address for reprints : Hyung Ki Park Department of Neurosurgery, Soonchunhyang University Hospital, 59 Daesagwan-ro, Yongsan-gu, Seoul 04401, Korea Tel : +82-2-709-9268, Fax : +82-2-792-5976, E-mail : schnsphk@gmail.com

Received 2021 March 30; Revised 2021 June 4; Accepted 2021 July 10.

Abstract

INTRODUCTION

People are living longer and the elderly population continues to increase worldwide. The population is expected to age rapidly in most countries, including Korea. Korea became an aging society (elderly population ≥7% of the total population) in 2000. In 2018, Korea became an aged society (defined as an elderly population ≥14% of the total population), and by 2026 Korea will be a super-aged society (elderly population ≥20% of the total population) [37]. The incidence of degenerative spinal disease (DSD) in the elderly population is quite high [36,38]. Therefore, we are facing more patients with DSD and initiating surgery in increasing numbers of geriatric patients [20].

The incidence of perioperative complications is higher in elderly patients than in younger patients, resulting in higher morbidity and mortality in this patient population [19]. Although age is associated with an increased risk of surgical complications, this does not mean that spinal surgery cannot be safely performed due to advanced age [36]. However, some surgeons are reluctant to perform surgery in elderly patients because of the high risk of perioperative complications due to the patient’s old age. Thus, clarifying risk of surgery in elderly patients is an important factor in decision-making and the preoperative optimization of patients [22]. Assessing the risk of surgery of an individual patient can be difficult, especially in the elderly, due to discrepancies between an individual’s physiological age and chronological age [17].

Frailty and sarcopenia have been attracting attention as factors for evaluation of physiological age in recent studies of risk factors for surgery in elderly patients [16,26]. Frailty is defined as a medical syndrome characterized by a decline in strength and endurance and reduced physiologic function that increase the vulnerability for increased dependency [31]. Frailty is a universal risk factor for recurrent falls, delirium, institutionalization, and poor postoperative outcome [26]. Recently, there has been interest in the gerontology field in quantifying the increased risk of perioperative complications from frailty [1,22,35,38]. The physical phenotype of frailty shares the characteristic of decrease of muscle strength, similar to sarcopenia [4]. The term “sarcopenia” is used to indicate progressive reduced muscle mass, reduced muscle strength, and reduced function that affects older adults [10,28]. Recent studies have reported that central sarcopenia, as measured by psoas cross-sectional area, has been associated with adverse events after cardiovascular surgery [2,18,24,30,39]. However, the impact of central sarcopenia in spine surgery for elderly patients has not yet been well characterized. Understanding the significance and association of frailty and central sarcopenia as risk factors for spinal surgery in elderly patients will be helpful in improving surgical outcomes.

We conducted a retrospective cohort analysis of prospectively collected data to assess the impact of preoperative central sarcopenia, frailty, and comorbidity on surgical outcome in elderly patients with DSD.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Central sarcopenia

There are two main methods for measuring sarcopenia : measuring muscle performance or imaging muscle mass [10]. We measured central sarcopenia by measuring the cross-sectional area of the psoas muscle [15]. Using preoperative computed tomography (CT) scan, the cross-sectional areas of the left and right psoas muscles were calculated at the level of the L4 pedicle. To reduce error, these measurements was calculated by two researchers and averaged. To normalize for body habitus, the cross-sectional area of the L4 vertebral body was also recorded at this level (Fig. 1). We calculated the 50th percentile of psoas : L4 vertebral index (PLVI) using the following formula [15] : [right PCSA (mm²) + left PCSA (mm²) / 2] / L4 vertebral CSA (mm²).

Fig. 1.

The 50th percentile of psoas : L4 vertebral index (PLVI) was calculated as the ratio between the mean psoas cross-sectional area and the vertebral body cross-sectional area at the level of the L4 pedicle.

RESULTS

Patient demographics

A total of 128 patients were initially selected; after excluding 43 patients based on exclusion criteria as described in the MATERIALS AND METHODS, this study included 85 patients. The patient group included 35 males (41.2%) and 50 females (58.8%); the mean age was 74.05±6.47 years. The average BMI and BSA were 25.12±2.97 kg/m² and 1.64±0.19 m², respectively. Regarding the K-FRAIL scale, four patients (4.7%) were scored as robust, 44 patients (51.8%) were pre-frail and 37 patients (43.5%) were frail. The mean PLVI was 0.61±0.19. Surgical diagnoses included spinal stenosis (51 patients), herniation of intervertebral disc (16 patients), spondylolisthesis (10 patients), and other (eight patients). Regarding surgical invasiveness, 16 patients (18.8%) were scored 8 points or more. The mean operative time was 154.84±85.54 hours. According to the CD classification, 50 patients were classified as grade 1, 19 as grade 2, and four as grade 4. The mean LOS was 12.35±8.17 days (Table 1).

Table 1.

Patient characteristics in the study group (n=85)

Postoperative complications

Postoperative complications occurred in 35 patients (41.2%). The most common complications were poor oral intake (16 patients, 18.8%), voiding difficulty (14 patients, 16.5%), urinary tract infection (four patients, 4.7%), pneumonia (three patients, 3.5%), and delirium (three patients, 3.5%) (Table 2). Univariate analysis showed that age, surgical invasiveness, CCI, and K-FRAIL scale were statistically significant : age (odds ratio [OR], 1.112; 95% confidence interval [CI], 1.033–1.197; p=0.05), surgical invasiveness (OR, 1.361; 95% CI, 0.841–1.881; p<0.001), CCI (OR, 1.923; 95% CI, 1.270–2.911; p=0.002), and K-FRAIL scale (OR, 0.102; 95% CI, 0.009–0.158; p=0.001). Multivariate stepwise regression analysis showed that postoperative complication was significantly associated with surgical invasiveness (p<0.001) and K-FRAIL scale (p=0.006) (Table 3).

Table 2.

Postoperative complications in patients (n=85)

Table 3.

Analysis of variables for postoperative complication

LOS

The mean LOS was 12.35±8.17 days. Univariate analysis showed that age, operation time, surgical invasiveness, CCI, and K-FRAIL scale were statistically significant : age (OR, 0.416; 95% CI, 0.156–0.676; p=0.002), operation time (OR, 0.026; 95% CI, 0.06–0.046; p=0.011), surgical invasiveness (OR, 1.361; 95% CI, 0.841–1.881; p<0.001), CCI (OR, 3.150; 95% CI, 1.878–4.423; p<0.001), and K-FRAIL scale (OR, 2.612; 95% CI, 0.983–4.241; p=0.002). Multivariate stepwise regression analysis was performed, and LOS was associated with surgical invasiveness (OR, 1.088; 95% CI, 0.606–1.571; p<0.001) and CCI (OR, 2.204; 95% CI, 0.974–3.435; p=0.001) (Table 4).

Table 4.

Analysis of variables for length of stay

Central sarcopenia and frailty

Pearson correlation analysis was performed between the K-FRAIL scale and PLVI. The Pearson correlation coefficient was -0.242, and the p-value was 0.026. This showed a significant negative correlation (Fig. 2).

Fig. 2.

Pearson correlation between K-FRAIL and PLVI (coefficient, -0.242; p=0.026). PLVI : the 50th percentile of psoas : L4 vertebral index, K-FRAIL scale : Korean version of the FRAIL scale.

DISCUSSION

There is a general assumption that the outcomes of spine surgery in the geriatric population are worse than in the young and middle-aged populations. However, this has not been demonstrated in the literature [1,38]. The most important reason for this may be due to widely varying discrepancies between an individual patient’s physiological age and chronological age [17]. Therefore, frailty and sarcopenia have been attracting attention as factors for evaluating the physiological state of elderly patients.

Frailty is characterized by physiological age-related decreases in energy, cognitive function, physical health, and other deficits that collectively make the patient more vulnerable to stressors, resulting in adverse outcomes [4,6,17]. Consensus on how best to define and measure frailty remains elusive [1,2,5]. Frailty has been measured using different methods in the literature. Two major models of defining frailty are the frailty phenotype and the deficit accumulation model, also known as the frailty index [26,35]. Segal et al. [33] found that higher scores from the 5-item modified Frailty Index were associated with an increased rate of complications and readmission in patients who underwent kyphoplasty. A modified Frailty Index based on the Canadian Study of Health and Aging-Frailty Index, which comprises 11 items, has also been proven effective in various surgical populations [23,26]. However, this index does not adequately reflect physical phenotype. An ideal tool for assessing frailty would be quick and cost-effective, incorporating relevant criteria that are easily disseminated for clinical applications as well as research [1]. The K-FRAIL scale is correlated with the frailty index and is a simple tool to screen for frailty in a clinical setting [21]. The questionnaire can be relatively easily and quickly administered for estimating the physical phenotype. To the best of our knowledge, this is the first study using the K-FRAIL scale screening method for spine surgery of the elderly population.

Previous evidence has indicated that higher levels of frailty correlate independently with mortality, postoperative complications, prolonged hospital LOS, and discharge to a rehabilitation facility in surgery of elderly populations [1,17,20,22,23,26,35,38]. Our study showed that postoperative complications were significantly associated with frailty measured by the K-FRAIL scale. Spinal surgeons need to recognize the correlation between frailty and preoperative risk in the elderly population. The ability of a frailty index to estimate postoperative complications depends on the index used to measure frailty. Therefore, tools to assess frailty are even more crucial. The K-FRAIL scale is recommended as a screening test for the evaluation of frailty in spinal surgery for elderly patients due to its simple, convenient, and measurement of physical phenotype.

The term “sarcopenia” is used to indicate progressive low muscle mass, low muscle strength, and low function that affect older adults [11,16,28]. Sarcopenia is one element of frailty syndrome that is unaffected by acute changes in clinical status or patient effort [2]. Reduced grip strength of sarcopenia is common criteria in physical frailty [11]. The cause of sarcopenia is generally thought to be multifactorial [11,28]. Sarcopenia is associated with increased adverse outcomes including a loss of independence, frailty, poor quality of life, increased healthcare costs, and mortality [11,14,28]. Although the prevalence of sarcopenia may vary in the same cohort due to different diagnostic criteria, the prevalence of sarcopenia globally will continue to increase because of the overall increase in aging populations [10,37]. Diagnosis of sarcopenia requires measurement of a combination of muscle mass, muscle strength, and physical performance [10,11]. The most effective assessment for diagnosis involves the use of dual energy X-ray absorptiometry, bioelectrical impedance analysis, CT, and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), and these can also have a role in some setting associated with other diseases [11,14]. CT and MRI are mostly used in diagnosis and when needed for the follow-up of changed conditions in patients with DSD. Therefore, evaluation of sarcopenia using CT and MRI can be very useful for patients with spinal diseases.

Central sarcopenia through measuring psoas muscle has recently been studied as a predictor of outcome in elderly medical patients [24]. Psoas muscle area (PMA) can be measured on CT scans and has been shown to correlate well with whole body muscle mass [18,34]. In cardiac transplant patients, lower PMA is also associated with increased in-hospital mortality or major morbidity and worse long-term survival [2,6,39]. The psoas muscle impacts functional recovery after major surgery. A validated method for quantifying sarcopenia is measurement of the PMA [2,18,24,39]. PMA can be quantified using cross-sectional CT scans with good inter-observer correlation, and PMA correlates with sarcopenia [2,24]. The PLVI using CT scan in our study has the advantage that it can be easily measured in all patients with spinal disease [15]. However, whether PMA is the most sensitive or specific indicator for frailty has not yet been determined [2].

In our study, central sarcopenia assessed using PLVI on CT was statistically associated with the K-FRAIL scale but was not strongly associated with postoperative complication and LOS. Our results suggest that PLVI is associated with frailty but is not a significant risk factor for postoperative outcomes. Whether PLVI can accurately reflect sarcopenia and whether sarcopenia is less associated with the outcome of spinal surgery should be investigated, and further research is required to address these questions.

Comorbidity is an established risk factor for complications during spine surgery [27,38]. In 1987, Charlson et al. [8] developed an age-based CCI score, but subsequent studies showed that age and CCI should be examined separately in multivariable predictor analyses of surgical outcomes, especially with large sample sizes [7]. In our study, a higher CCI appeared to associate with increased LOS after surgery. In spinal surgery of elderly patients, comorbidities should be concerned before planning surgery.

Fusion surgery leads to more complications than decompression surgery due to increased blood loss, longer operation time, and higher infection rate [20,22]. Dagistan et al. [12] concluded that increased operative times and instrumentation and fusion procedures were strongly associated with an increased risk of developing complications. Kobayashi et al. [25] concluded that reducing surgical invasiveness is important in treatment of very elderly patients. Deyo et al. [13] showed that as the complexity of surgery increases, the risk of life-threatening complications also increases. The surgical invasiveness index used in our study is a previously validated instrument that accounts for the number of vertebral levels decompressed, arthrodesed, or instrumented as well as the surgical approach [9]. Our study demonstrated that as the surgical invasiveness increased, postoperative complications and LOS increased. These findings further validate the importance of surgical invasiveness when performing spine surgery in elderly patients.

Historically, surgeons have relied on clinical experience to determine patients for surgery, but risk assessment and stratification also ascertain the ability of patients to tolerate surgery. Accurate and timely risk stratification before surgery is crucial to ensure successful outcomes, especially among older and higher risk populations [1,38]. A risk assessment must be made for each patient in a specific surgery. This requires a systematic and integrated approach and evaluation of risk factors related to surgery and patients. In our study, we examined the relationship of complications by CD classification using the K-FRAIL scale, PMA measurements and the surgical invasiveness index, which can be conveniently used in the outpatient clinic. The findings of our study have important implications in risk stratification, perioperative planning, and the counseling of elderly patients with DSD. Assessment of risk factors should be implemented in the pre-surgical period, including during pre-rehabilitation, nutritional supplementation, medication adjustment, and preoperative medication [38].

CONCLUSION

The present study demonstrates that frailty, comorbidity, and surgical invasiveness are important risk factors for postoperative complication and LOS in elderly patients with DSD. Preoperative recognition of these factors may be useful for perioperative optimization, risk stratification, and patient counseling. Central sarcopenia assessed by PLVI using CT scan was associated with the K-FRAIL scale. Future research should further assess the significance of central sarcopenia in this scale as a risk factor for surgical outcome.

Supplementary materials

Article information Continued