| Home | E-Submission | Sitemap | Editorial Office |  
top_img
Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society > Volume 50(3); 2011 > Article
Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society 2011;50(3): 166-172.
doi: https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2011.50.3.166
A Computed Tomography-Based Anatomic Comparison of Three Different Types of C7 Posterior Fixation Techniques : Pedicle, Intralaminar, and Lateral Mass Screws.
Woo Young Jang, Il Sup Kim, Ho Jin Lee, Jae Hoon Sung, Sang Won Lee, Jae Taek Hong
Department of Neurosurgery, The Catholic University of Korea, St. Vincent's Hospital, Suwon, Korea. jatagi15@paran.com
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE:
The intralaminar screw (ILS) fixation technique offers an alternative to pedicle screw (PS) and lateral mass screw (LMS) fixation in the C7 spine. Although cadaveric studies have described the anatomy of the pedicles, laminae, and lateral masses at C7, 3-dimensional computed tomography (CT) imaging is the modality of choice for pre-surgical planning. In this study, the goal was to determine the anatomical parameter and optimal screw trajectory for ILS placement at C7, and to compare this information to PS and LMS placement in the C7 spine as determined by CT evaluation.
METHODS:
A total of 120 patients (60 men and 60 women) with an average age of 51.7+/-13.6 years were selected by retrospective review of a trauma registry database over a 2-year period. Patients were included in the study if they were older than 15 years of age, had standardized axial bone-window CT imaging at C7, and had no evidence of spinal trauma. For each lamina and pedicle, width (outer cortical and inner cancellous), maximal screw length, and optimal screw trajectory were measured, and the maximal screw length of the lateral mass were measured using m-view 5.4 software. Statistical analysis was performed using Student's t-test.
RESULTS:
At C7, the maximal PS length was significantly greater than the ILS and LMS length (PS, 33.9+/-3.1 mm; ILS, 30.8+/-3.1 mm; LMS, 10.6+/-1.3; p<0.01). When the outer cortical and inner cancellous width was compared between the pedicle and lamina, the mean pedicle outer cortical width at C7 was wider than the lamina by an average of 0.6 mm (pedicle, 6.8+/-1.2 mm; lamina, 6.2+/-1.2 mm; p<0.01). At C7, 95.8% of the laminae measured accepted a 4.0-mm screw with a 1.0 mm of clearance, compared with 99.2% of pedicle. Of the laminae measured, 99.2% accepted a 3.5-mm screw with a 1.0 mm clearance, compared with 100% of the pedicle. When the outer cortical and inner cancellous height was compared between pedicle and lamina, the mean lamina outer cortical height at C7 was wider than the pedicle by an average of 9.9 mm (lamina, 18.6+/-2.0 mm; pedicle, 8.7+/-1.3 mm; p<0.01). The ideal screw trajectory at C7 was also measured (47.8+/-4.8degrees for ILS and 35.1+/-8.1degrees for PS).
CONCLUSION:
Although pedicle screw fixation is the most ideal instrumentation method for C7 fixation with respect to length and cortical diameter, anatomical aspect of C7 lamina is affordable to place screw. Therefore, the C7 intralaminar screw could be an alternative fixation technique with few anatomic limitations in the cases when C7 pedicle screw fixation is not favorable. However, anatomical variations in the length and width must be considered when placing an intralaminar or pedicle screw at C7.
Key Words: Intralaminar screw; Pedicle screw; Lateral mass screw; Anatomic study
TOOLS
PDF Links  PDF Links
Full text via DOI  Full text via DOI
Download Citation  Download Citation
CrossRef TDM  CrossRef TDM
  E-Mail
Share:      
METRICS
8
Crossref
10
Scopus
1,541
View
6
Download
Related article
Editorial Office
#402, 27 Chilparo, Jung-gu, Seoul 04511, Korea
TEL: +82-2-525-7552   FAX: +82-2-525-7554   E-mail: kns61@neurosurgery.or.kr
About |  Browse Articles |  Current Issue |  For Authors and Reviewers
Copyright © Korean Neurosurgical Society.                 Developed in M2PI
Close layer
prev next