| Home | E-Submission | Sitemap | Editorial Office |  
top_img
Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society > Volume 58(4); 2015 > Article
Hoe, Choi, Kim, Kwon, Kim, and Cho: Peritumoral Brain Edema after Stereotactic Radiosurgery for Asymptomatic Intracranial Meningiomas: Risks and Pattern of Evolution

Abstract

Objective

To investigate the risks and pattern of evolution of peritumoral brain edema (PTE) after stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) for asymptomatic intracranial meningiomas.

Methods

A retrospective study was conducted on 320 patients (median age 56 years, range 24-87 years) who underwent primary Gamma Knife radiosurgery for asymptomatic meningiomas between 1998 and 2012. The median tumor volume was 2.7 cc (range 0.2-10.5 cc) and the median follow-up was 48 months (range 24-168 months). Volumetric data sets for tumors and PTE on serial MRIs were analyzed. The edema index (EI) was defined as the ratio of the volume of PTE including tumor to the tumor volume, and the relative edema indices (rEIs) were calculated from serial EIs normalized against the baseline EI. Risk factors for PTE were analyzed using logistic regression.

Results

Newly developed or increased PTE was noted in 49 patients (15.3%), among whom it was symptomatic in 28 patients (8.8%). Tumor volume larger than 4.2 cc (p<0.001), hemispheric tumor location (p=0.005), and pre-treatment PTE (p<0.001) were associated with an increased risk of PTE. rEI reached its maximum value at 11 months after SRS and decreased thereafter, and symptoms resolved within 24 months in most patients (85.7%).

Conclusion

Caution should be exercised in decision-making on SRS for asymptomatic meningiomas of large volume (>4.2 cc), of hemispheric location, or with pre-treatment PTE. PTE usually develops within months, reaches its maximum degree until a year, and resolves within 2 years after SRS.

INTRODUCTION

Meningioma is the most common primary brain tumor in adults according to the recent population-based data from Korea and the Central Brain Tumor Registry of the United States9,1623). As brain imaging has become a routine practice nowadays, incidental or asymptomatic meningiomas are seen more frequently than before, and they can be managed successfully by stereotactic radiosurgery (SRS) in selected cases. The excellent long term local tumor control (LTC) rate and greater safety of SRS for meningiomas are well appreciated with the LTC rates at 5 to 10 years of 87 to 98%12,1326,2730,32).
However, adverse radiation effects such as increased peritumoral brain edema (PTE) may develop after SRS and are not uncommon accounting for 15% to 28% of unselected cases2,312,1417,1820,29), and it has been reported to cause neurological symptoms in 3% to 15%3,1820,2629,32). Large tumor volume (>4.2 cc to 10 cc), hemispheric tumor location, higher prescription dose (>15 Gy to 16 Gy), and pre-treatment PTE have been associated with an increased risk of the development of PTE after SRS11,1214,1720,2628,32). Meanwhile, the risks and the clinical course of PTE after primary SRS for asymptomatic intracranial meningiomas are not clearly elucidated without being based on clinical data on large homogenous cohort of asymptomatic tumors. Herein, we did a retrospective study on 320 patients with asymptomatic meningiomas treated with SRS as a primary modality and investigated the incidence, risk factors, and pattern of evolution of PTE after SRS using a serial volumetric analysis of magnetic resonance images (MRIs).

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Patient and tumor characteristics (Table 1)

This study was approved by our institutional review board. Among a total of 857 consecutive patients who underwent SRS using Gamma Knife (Elekta AB, Stockholm, Sweden) for intracranial meningiomas at our department between 1998 and 2012, those with asymptomatic tumors who had been followed up a minimum two years using MRI after SRS were included, and those with multiple meningiomas or who received a prior surgical resection or any form of cranial irradiation were excluded. By these criteria, a retrospective cohort of 320 patients harboring 320 meningiomas was identified. The follow-up duration ranged from 24 months to 168 months (median 48 months). There were 260 women (81.3%) and 60 men with the median age of 56 years (range 24-87 years). The median tumor volume was 2.7 cc (range 0.2-10.5 cc) and the location of tumor varied as shown in Table 1. Pre-treatment PTE was present in 19 tumors (5.9%).

Stereotactic radiosurgery and radiosurgical parameters

All patients were treated using one of Leksell Gamma Knife units B, C, or Perfexion. Treatment plans were generated using the Elekta GammaPlan system based on gadolinium-enhanced axial 3-dimensional T1-magnetization-prepared rapid acquisition gradient echo MR images (1.5 mm slice thickness) fused with CT images (1.25 mm slice). The optimal plan was produced by adjustment of the collimators and sectors such that optimal dose coverage of the target was achieved while minimizing dose to the surrounding normal tissues. The median prescription dose was 13 Gy (range 10-18 Gy; mean±SD=13.0±1.3 Gy) with the median prescription isodose line of 50% (range 40-60%). The quality of each radiosurgical plan was assessed using tumor coverage, the maximum, mean, and minimum doses, the homogeneity index (HI), the conformity index (CI), and the gradient index (GI). HI was measured as the ratio of the maximum dose over the prescription dose. CI was defined as the ratio of prescription isodose volume to the volume of tumor receiving the prescription dose or more. GI was the ratio of the isodose volume receiving 50% of the prescription dose to prescription isodose volume. The median tumor coverage was 98% (range 81-100%). The median maximum dose was 26 Gy (range 20-36 Gy). The median values (ranges) of HI, CI, and GI were 2.0 (1.66-2.51), 1.45 (1.13-2.23), and 2.83 (2.41-3.67), respectively (Table 2).

Follow-up examination and serial volumetric analysis of MRI

Clinical examination and MRI after SRS were performed at 3-months to 6-month intervals during the first year, annually for two years, and biennially thereafter. If patients exhibited any relevant symptoms or signs, more frequent follow-up was carried as needed.
Volumetric data sets for tumors and PTE on serial MRIs were obtained using the in-house software based on the ImageJ, a java-based image processing program developed at the National Institutes of Health (http://rsbweb.nih.gov/ij/). Each image slice was cropped at the margin of the target area (either tumor or PTE), and the target volume was calculated as the sum of the areas multiplied by the slice thickness. Treatment failure or tumor progression was defined either as an increase of tumor volume ≥15% compared with the baseline tumor volume or as marginal tumor growth, and stable disease was designated for tumor volume changes within the range of ±15%. The edema index (EI) was defined as the ratio of peritumoral high signal intensity volume including tumor volume on T2-weighted or fluid-attenuated inversion recovery MRI to tumor volume on T1-weighted gadolinium-enhanced MRI. In each tumor, serial EIs were measured on follow-up MRIs after SRS, and the relative edema indices (rEIs) were calculated from these values normalized against the baseline EI. Any neurological symptom that matched increased PTE on MRI was regarded as symptomatic PTE.

Statistical analysis

LTC was estimated using the Kaplan-Meier method calculated from the treatment start date to the date of events or the last follow-up. Factors possibly affecting the development of PTE including age, gender, tumor volume (≥4.2 cc vs. <4.2 cc; the volume equivalent to a diameter 2 cm) and location, pre-treatment PTE, prescription dose, prescription isodose line, tumor coverage, the maximum, mean and minimum doses, HI, CI, and GI were tested using logistic regression for univariate analysis. Tumor location was grouped into two categories : category 1 (mostly of hemispheric location, 64.1%) where tumors maintaining a scant intervening cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) space in between the tumor and the adjacent brain included cerebral convexity, parasagittal, falx, olfactory groove/planum sphenoidale, sphenoid ridge, frontal/temporal base, tentorial, and cerebellar convexity locations vs. category 2 (mostly of skull base, 35.9%) where tumors possessing a relatively sufficient CSF space in between included clinoidal, parasellar/cavernous sinus, cerebellopontine angle, jugular foramen, and intraventricular locations. Factors with p values of 0.05 or less in univariate analysis were accepted as statistically significant and then included in multivariate logistic regression model. All statistical tests were conducted using the SPSS Version 21.0 (SPSS, Chicago, IL, USA) and the R software Version 3.1.1.

RESULTS

Local tumor control was achieved in 313 of 320 patients (97.8%). The estimated LTC rates at 5 and 10 years were 98.8% and 90.5%, respectively (Fig. 1). Tumor volume decreased in 191 patients (59.7%), remained unchanged in 122 (38.1%), and increased in 7 (2.2 %).
Newly developed or increased PTE on MRI (defined as rEI ≥1.25) was noted in 49 patients (15.3%), among whom it was symptomatic in 28 patients (57.1%; 8.8% of the entire cohort) causing seizure (n=13, 46.4%), aggravating headache (n=12, 42.9%), or hemiparesis (n=6, 21.4%). Those patients with symptoms were medicated with a temporary course of steroids, and none of them underwent a craniotomy.

Risk factors for peritumoral brain edema after SRS

In both univariate and multivariate analyses, tumor volume larger than 4.2 cc (p<0.001 in multivariate analysis), tumor location of category 1 (p=0.005), and the presence of pre-treatment PTE (p<0.001) were associated with an increased risk of the development of PTE after SRS (Table 3). Radiosurgical parameters did not affect the development of PTE.

Pattern of evolution of peritumoral brain edema after SRS

rEIs in tumors with increased PTE were plotted over the time after SRS and fitted to a LOESS curve (Fig. 2). The maximum value of rEI was 4.96±0.45 (mean±SEM) at 11 months after SRS. The time window for three-fold (halfway between the baseline and the maximum rEIs) or more increase of PTE was 15 months starting from 3 months and ending at 18 months after SRS. rEIs decreased to 1.70±0.50 at 24 months after SRS.
In 28 patients who developed symptomatic PTE, the maximum value of rEI was 4.99±4.20 (mean±SD) at the time of median 12 months (range 4-48 months) after SRS. The median time to symptom onset was 6 months (range 3-18 months), and the median duration of symptoms was 6 months (range 3-78 months). A representative case is illustrated in Fig. 3. In most patients (24 of 28 patients, 85.7%), symptoms were transient and resolved completely within 24 months, but were sustained for more than 24 months (24, 33, 71, and 81 months) in 4 patients.

DISCUSSION

Treatment options for asymptomatic intracranial meningiomas include observation, surgery, and radiotherapy including SRS. Because many of these tumors are small in size, SRS which is less invasive and safer than but comparably effective as open surgery is often a preferred option when treatment is considered and as such, is increasingly used in this subgroup of meningiomas. Nevertheless, the prophylactic use of SRS for the purposes of tumor control and prevention of symptom development must be carefully balanced against the indolent natural history of benign meningiomas and potential risks of adverse radiation effects. According to studies on the natural history of meningiomas in the literature, tumor growth has been demonstrated in 22% to 63% of tumors during the mean (or median) follow-up of 2.5 to 4.2 years8,1519,2124,3334), and 13% to 26% of cases eventually developed symptoms or required treatment19,2433). With the median follow-up of 48 months in the present study, only 7 of 320 tumors (2.2%) increased in volume >15%, and tumor volume decreased in 59.7% of cases, demonstrating that SRS significantly altered tumor growth patterns. On the other hand, 49 tumors (15.3%) developed an increased PTE on MRI after SRS, and it caused neurological symptoms in 28 patients (8.8%) probably affecting the activities of daily living adversely, emphasizing the importance of better understanding the risk factors to avoid this potentially serious complication.
Among various factors that have been reported to be associated with an increased risk of the development PTE after SRS, factors such as large tumor volume, hemispheric tumor location, higher prescription dose, and pre-treatment PTE are commonly appreciated based on large clinical studies3,712,1420,2526,32), which is almost consistent with the present study. Cai et al.2) suggested the tumor-brain contact interface area as a strong predictor for the development of PTE and proposed a mechanistic relationship of the tumor-brain interface disruption by virtue of tumor growth (large tumor volume) and SRS treatment to the consequent formation and/or aggravation of PTE after SRS. In addition to this concept, we focused on the amount of intervening CSF in between tumor and the brain, which may act as a mechanical and biochemical buffer against mediators released from tumor. As expected, tumor location where tumors maintaining a scant amount of intervening CSF (mostly hemispheric vs. skull base) was independently associated with a significantly increased risk of PTE. Lines of evidence support that PTE in meningiomas is vasogenic, not cytotoxic and associated with increased vascular permeability of meningioma tissue, not surrounding normal tissue1,531). Intrinsic tumor factors that have been implicated in the development of PTE include certain histological subtypes (angiomatous, microcystic, and secretory), higher histological grade, high proliferation index, and expression of the markers of angiogenesis and hypoxia (vascular endothelial growth factor and hypoxia-inducible factor-1)10,22). Considering these facts, it is not surprising that radiosurgical parameters other than dose to tumor (prescription dose and maximum dose) are not associated with the development of PTE6,1217,2028). The present study did not found prescription dose as a significant risk factor, because most patients had been treated with prescription dose <15 Gy (13.0±1.3 Gy).
Similar to the results in the present study, PTE and symptoms caused by it after SRS represented a more or less typical course and resolved within 2 years in the majority of cases2,310,1113,28), and the chronological patterns of PTE fairly matched the clinical courses of patient symptoms2,1112,25). In our analysis, PTE on MRI developed or increased within months, reached its maximum extent of five-fold over the basal level at 11 months, and decreased thereafter to below two-fold over the basal level until 2 years after SRS, and the time to symptom onset and its duration approximated to this pattern of PTE. Permanent deficits from PTE after SRS have been reported in less than 3% and were rarely disabling4,1230), although exceptional fatal cases have been also reported26). In the present study, 4 of 320 patients (1.3%) harbored sustaining neurological symptoms beyond 2 years.
This study represents the largest clinical series of asymptomatic meningiomas treated with primary SRS and provides a useful clinical picture on the risks and the chronological course of PTE in this subgroup of meningiomas that will be encountered more frequently henceforth. Careful patient selection is of utmost importance in planning for the safest treatment.

CONCLUSION

Although SRS is effective and safe in by far the majority of patients with asymptomatic meningiomas, a small fraction of patients may suffer from the development of PTE after SRS. Caution should be exercised in decision-making on SRS for tumors of large volume (>4.2 cc), of hemispheric location, or with pre-treatment PTE. In case, PTE usually develops within months, reaches its maximum degree until a year, and resolves within 2 years after SRS.

Acknowledgements

This paper was presented at the 14th Asian Australasian Congress of Neurological Surgeons held on April 15th to 18th, 2015.

References

1. Bitzer M, Klose U, Geist-Barth B, Nägele T, Schick F, Morgalla M, et al : Alterations in diffusion and perfusion in the pathogenesis of peritumoral brain edema in meningiomas. Eur Radiol 12 : 2062-2076, 2002
crossref pmid
2. Cai R, Barnett GH, Novak E, Chao ST, Suh JH : Principal risk of peritumoral edema after stereotactic radiosurgery for intracranial meningioma is tumor-brain contact interface area. Neurosurgery 66 : 513-522, 2010
crossref pmid
3. Chang JH, Chang JW, Choi JY, Park YG, Chung SS : Complications after gamma knife radiosurgery for benign meningiomas. J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry 74 : 226-230, 2003
crossref pmid pmc
4. Chang SD, Adler JR Jr : Treatment of cranial base meningiomas with linear accelerator radiosurgery. Neurosurgery 41 : 1019-1025, discussion 1025-10271997
crossref pmid
5. Gilbert JJ, Paulseth JE, Coates RK, Malott D : Cerebral edema associated with meningiomas. Neurosurgery 12 : 599-605, 1983
crossref pmid
6. Girvigian MR, Chen JC, Rahimian J, Miller MJ, Tome M : Comparison of early complications for patients with convexity and parasagittal meningiomas treated with either stereotactic radiosurgery or fractionated stereotactic radiotherapy. Neurosurgery 62(5 Suppl):A19-A27, discussion A27-A282008
crossref pmid
7. Hasegawa T, Kida Y, Yoshimoto M, Iizuka H, Ishii D, Yoshida K : Gamma Knife surgery for convexity, parasagittal, and falcine meningiomas. J Neurosurg 114 : 1392-1398, 2011
crossref pmid
8. Hashiba T, Hashimoto N, Izumoto S, Suzuki T, Kagawa N, Maruno M, et al : Serial volumetric assessment of the natural history and growth pattern of incidentally discovered meningiomas. J Neurosurg 110 : 675-684, 2009
crossref pmid
9. Jung KW, Ha J, Lee SH, Won YJ, Yoo H : An updated nationwide epidemiology of primary brain tumors in Republic of Korea. Brain Tumor Res Treat 1 : 16-23, 2013
crossref pmid pmc
10. Kan P, Liu JK, Wendland MM, Shrieve D, Jensen RL : Peritumoral edema after stereotactic radiosurgery for intracranial meningiomas and molecular factors that predict its development. J Neurooncol 83 : 33-38, 2007
crossref pmid
11. Kim DG, Kim CH, Chung HT, Paek SH, Jeong SS, Han DH, et al : Gamma knife surgery of superficially located meningioma. J Neurosurg 102(Suppl):255-258, 2005
crossref pmid
12. Kollová A, Liscák R, Novotný J Jr, Vladyka V, Simonová G, Janousková L : Gamma Knife surgery for benign meningioma. J Neurosurg 107 : 325-336, 2007
crossref pmid
13. Kondziolka D, Mathieu D, Lunsford LD, Martin JJ, Madhok R, Niranjan A, et al : Radiosurgery as definitive management of intracranial meningiomas. Neurosurgery 62 : 53-58, discussion 58-602008
crossref pmid
14. Kuhn EN, Taksler GB, Dayton O, Loganathan A, Bourland D, Tatter SB, et al : Is there a tumor volume threshold for postradiosurgical symptoms? A single-institution analysis. Neurosurgery 75 : 536-545, discussion 544-545quiz 5452014
crossref pmid
15. Kuratsu J, Kochi M, Ushio Y : Incidence and clinical features of asymptomatic meningiomas. J Neurosurg 92 : 766-770, 2000
crossref pmid
16. Lee CH, Jung KW, Yoo H, Park S, Lee SH : Epidemiology of primary brain and central nervous system tumors in Korea. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 48 : 145-152, 2010
crossref pmid pmc
17. Lee SR, Yang KA, Kim SK, Kim SH : Radiation-induced intratumoral necrosis and peritumoral edema after gamma knife radiosurgery for intracranial meningiomas. J Korean Neurosurg Soc 52 : 98-102, 2012
crossref pmid pmc
18. Mansouri A, Larjani S, Klironomos G, Laperriere N, Cusimano M, Gentili F, et al : Predictors of response to Gamma Knife radiosurgery for intracranial meningiomas. J Neurosurg 1-7, 2015
crossref
19. Nakamura M, Roser F, Michel J, Jacobs C, Samii M : The natural history of incidental meningiomas. Neurosurgery 53 : 62-70, discussion 70-712003
crossref pmid
20. Novotný J Jr, Kollová A, Liscák R : Prediction of intracranial edema after radiosurgery of meningiomas. J Neurosurg 105(Suppl):120-126, 2006
crossref pmid
21. Olivero WC, Lister JR, Elwood PW : The natural history and growth rate of asymptomatic meningiomas : a review of 60 patients. J Neurosurg 83 : 222-224, 1995
crossref pmid
22. Osawa T, Tosaka M, Nagaishi M, Yoshimoto Y : Factors affecting peritumoral brain edema in meningioma : special histological subtypes with prominently extensive edema. J Neurooncol 111 : 49-57, 2013
crossref pmid
23. Ostrom QT, Gittleman H, Farah P, Ondracek A, Chen Y, Wolinsky Y, et al : CBTRUS statistical report : primary brain and central nervous system tumors diagnosed in the United States in 2006-2010. Neuro Oncol 15(Suppl):ii1-ii56, 2013
crossref pmid pmc
24. Oya S, Kim SH, Sade B, Lee JH : The natural history of intracranial meningiomas. J Neurosurg 114 : 1250-1256, 2011
crossref pmid
25. Patil CG, Hoang S, Borchers DJ 3rd, Sakamoto G, Soltys SG, Gibbs IC, et al : Predictors of peritumoral edema after stereotactic radiosurgery of supratentorial meningiomas. Neurosurgery 63 : 435-440, discussion 440-4422008
crossref pmid
26. Pollock BE, Stafford SL, Link MJ, Brown PD, Garces YI, Foote RL : Single-fraction radiosurgery of benign intracranial meningiomas. Neurosurgery 71 : 604-612, discussion 6132012
crossref pmid
27. Santacroce A, Walier M, Régis J, Liščák R, Motti E, Lindquist C, et al : Long-term tumor control of benign intracranial meningiomas after radiosurgery in a series of 4565 patients. Neurosurgery 70 : 32-39, discussion 392012
crossref pmid
28. Sheehan JP, Lee CC, Xu Z, Przybylowski CJ, Melmer PD, Schlesinger D : Edema following Gamma Knife radiosurgery for parasagittal and parafalcine meningiomas. J Neurosurg 26 : 1-7, 2015
crossref
29. Singh VP, Kansai S, Vaishya S, Julka PK, Mehta VS : Early complications following gamma knife radiosurgery for intracranial meningiomas. J Neurosurg 93(Suppl):57-61, 2000
crossref pmid
30. Stafford SL, Pollock BE, Foote RL, Link MJ, Gorman DA, Schomberg PJ, et al : Meningioma radiosurgery : tumor control, outcomes, and complications among 190 consecutive patients. Neurosurgery 49 : 1029-1037, discussion 1037-10382001
crossref pmid
31. Stevens JM, Ruiz JS, Kendall BE : Observations on peritumoral oedema in meningioma. Part II : Mechanisms of oedema production. Neuroradiology 25 : 125-131, 1983
crossref pmid
32. Unger KR, Lominska CE, Chanyasulkit J, Randolph-Jackson P, White RL, Aulisi E, et al : Risk factors for posttreatment edema in patients treated with stereotactic radiosurgery for meningiomas. Neurosurgery 70 : 639-645, 2012
crossref pmid
33. Yano S, Kuratsu J : Kumamoto Brain Tumor Research GroupIndications for surgery in patients with asymptomatic meningiomas based on an extensive experience. J Neurosurg 105 : 538-543, 2006
crossref pmid
34. Yoneoka Y, Fujii Y, Tanaka R : Growth of incidental meningiomas. Acta Neurochir (Wien) 142 : 507-511, 2000
crossref pmid
Fig. 1

The Kaplan-Meier curve for local tumor control.

jkns-58-379-g001.jpg
Fig. 2

Spaghetti plots for relative edema indices over the time after stereotactic radiosurgery. The red line represents a fitted LOESS curve.

jkns-58-379-g002.jpg
Fig. 3

A 38-year-old man with asymptomatic parasagittal meningioma. Each pair of gadolinium-enhanced T1-weighted MRI and fluid-attenuated inversion recovery MRI is presented before (A), 6 months (B), 10 months (C), and 13 months (D) after Gamma Knife (GK) with a marginal dose of 13 Gy. A : The tumor volume was 6.1 cc and no peritumoral edema is seen before GK. B : He developed seizure and hemiparesis 6 months after GK. Note the internal necrotic change of tumor combined with a substantial amount of peritumoral edema. C and D : Edema decreased at 10 months (C) and nearly disappeared at 13 months (D) after GK. His symptoms resolved completely.

jkns-58-379-g003.jpg
Table 1

Patient and tumor characteristics

jkns-58-379-i001.jpg
Table 2

Radiosurgical parameters

jkns-58-379-i002.jpg
Table 3

Risk factors for peritumoral brain edema on MRI (logistic regression model)

jkns-58-379-i003.jpg

*Category 1 included tumor locations of cerebral convexity, parasagittal, falx, olfactory groove/planum sphenoidale, sphenoid ridge, frontal/temporal base, tentorial, and cerebellar convexity. CI : confidence interval, PTE : peritumoral brain edema

Editorial Office
#402, 27 Chilparo, Jung-gu, Seoul 04511, Korea
TEL: +82-2-525-7552   FAX: +82-2-525-7554   E-mail: kns61@neurosurgery.or.kr
About |  Browse Articles |  Current Issue |  For Authors and Reviewers
Copyright © Korean Neurosurgical Society. All rights reserved.                 Developed in M2PI
Close layer
prev next