| Home | E-Submission | Sitemap | Editorial Office |  
top_img
Journal of Korean Neurosurgical Society 2010;47(4): 287-290.
doi: https://doi.org/10.3340/jkns.2010.47.4.287
Comparison of Different Microanastomosis Training Models : Model Accuracy and Practicality.
Gyojun Hwang, Chang Wan Oh, Sukh Que Park, Seung Hun Sheen, Jae Seung Bang, Hyun Seung Kang
1Department of Neurosurgery, Chuncheon Sacred Heart Hospital, Hallym University, Chuncheon, Gangwon, Korea.
2Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam, Korea. wanoh@snu.ac.kr
3Department of Neurosurgery, Soonchunhyang University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
4Department of Neurosurgery, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul, Korea.
ABSTRACT
OBJECTIVE
The authors evaluated the accuracies and ease of use of several commonly used microanastomosis training models (synthetic tube, chicken wing, and living rat model).
METHODS
A survey was conducted among neurosurgeons and neurosurgery residents at a workshop held in 2009 at the authors' institute. Questions addressed model accuracy (similarity to real vessels and actual procedures) and practicality (availability of materials and ease of application in daily practice). Answers to each question were rated using a 5-point scale. Participants were also asked what types of training methods they would chose to improve their skills and to introduce the topic to other neurosurgeons or neurosurgery residents.
RESULTS
Of the 24 participants, 20 (83.3%) responded to the survey. The living rat model was favored for model accuracy (p < 0.001; synthetic tube -0.95 +/- 0.686, chicken wing, 0.15 +/- 0.587, and rat, 1.75 +/- 0.444) and the chicken wing model for practicality (p < 0.001; synthetic tube -1.55 +/- 0.605, chicken wing, 1.80 +/- 0.523, and rat, 1.30 +/- 0.923). All (100%) chose the living rat model for improving their skills, and for introducing the subject to other neurosurgeons or neurosurgery residents, the chicken wing and living rat models were selected by 18 (90%) and 20 (100%), respectively.
CONCLUSION
Of 3 methods examined, the chicken wing model was found to be the most practical, but the living rat model was found to represent reality the best. We recommend the chicken wing model to train surgeons who have mastered basic techniques, and the living rat model for experienced surgeons to maintain skill levels.
Key Words: Cerebral revascularization; Microsurgery; Training
TOOLS
Full text via DOI  Full text via DOI
Download Citation  Download Citation
Share:      
METRICS
25
Crossref
27
Scopus
2,811
View
57
Download
Related article
Editorial Office
1F, 18, Heolleung-ro 569-gil, Gangnam-gu, Seoul, Republic of Korea
TEL: +82-2-525-7552   FAX: +82-2-525-7554   E-mail: office@jkns.or.kr
About |  Browse Articles |  Current Issue |  For Authors and Reviewers
Copyright © Korean Neurosurgical Society.                 Developed in M2PI
Close layer